# Math 101 - Fold Equity

Total Equity = Hand Equity + Fold Equity

Is total equity always 100%? If your hand has 40% equity then your fold equity is 60%.

"The more FE the more we can bluff. The less FE the more reliant we are on hand equity."

If you have more FE then you have less hand equity which essentially means the worse your hand is the more we can bluff. Is this correct?

#### Categories

- 11.4K All Categories
- 506 Come Say Hello
- 3.7K Live Poker Hands
- 498 Coaching & Commercial
- 2.3K Online Poker Hands
- 907 Tournament Poker Hands
- 46 Omaha Variants
- 95 Local Poker Groups
- 2.5K General Concepts
- 305 New To Poker Questions
- 177 Podcast, Articles, Freebies
- 81 CORE
- 315 Subscription Products
- 781 Off Topic Chat
- 23 Nutrition & Fitness
- 100 Challenge Forum
- 276 Hand Reading
- 140 Live Workbook (Vol 1)
- 62 6max Workbook (Vol 1)
- 32 Final Tables Workbook
- 78 Poker Software

## Comments

1,862-Author Poker Plays You Can Use

Author Poker Workbook for Math Geeks

142✭✭Unless total equity IS 100% & 100 = HE + FE

Even then "total equity" was never defined and leaves room for confusion. Unless its me lol. I never rule that out

3,503-To put it another way, if we get rid of these awful %s then equity is essentially a probability and as such it has some value between 0 and 1. There's no reason for it to always equal 1.

142✭✭This is one reason why it was so confusing and Im certain I was overthinking it. After rushing through level 1 I decided to start over, slow down, take notes and digest everything. In splits first video he stresses the importance of these things which I had foolishly neglected. Im also mostly an introvert and participating in forums is somthing a rarely do but Im also taking everyones advice to ask any questions and so here were are.

What also threw me off was that this presentation of a concept was delivered at the end of the math 101 couse which had been straight mathmatical equations up until this explanation of FE. So my mind was in that 1+1=2 mode and without a statement similar to Dougs reply before the FE definition I failed to see it that way and was trying to solve for "total equity".