GTO vs MOP

tfaziotfazio Red Chipper Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
So according to a video on GTORB traditional theory using alpha as in(1-a)% to solve for min defense frequencies in river nuts air vs bluff catcher spots and extrapolating back to flop or pre flop ranges as used in MOP has been disproven using GTO solvers.
These mathematical solutions were always simplified by using simple run outs and assumed pure nuts air bluff catcher situations.
Apparently GTO solvers prove earlier theories has bluffing and defense frequencies too high.
Amazing how computers is a short span of time can change our understanding of game theory.

Comments

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file